Austrian Grandmaster Felix Blohberger recently voiced serious concerns about the financial challenges facing chess players in Europe. In an eye-opening statement, he emphasized that many players, especially those not ranked in the top 30, find it increasingly difficult to make a living through chess alone. This situation reveals a pressing issue for the chess community amid growing disparities between the financial support available to players in different countries.
‘Things must change to keep professional chess alive in Europe’
Blohberger appeared in a recent YouTube video titled “Being a Chess Professional (in Europe) sucks,” where he opened up about the struggles that many European players face. He pointed out that stagnant tournament prize money is a key factor impacting players’ livelihoods. While some top players earn substantial winnings, those lower down the ranks often struggle to cover their expenses. This situation underscores a critical need for change to ensure the longevity of professional chess in Europe.
Contrasting Support: Asia vs. Europe
Interestingly, Blohberger noted the significant financial advantages that Asian players receive compared to their European counterparts. In his comments, he highlighted that countries in Asia are more willing to invest in their chess players, sometimes providing them with apartments, cars, and cash prizes as rewards for their successes. For instance, following their 2022 Olympiad victory, players from Uzbekistan were awarded various substantial gifts, while Indian players received a whopping Rs 3.2 crore after their 2024 Chess Olympiad win. In stark contrast, European players often see little in the way of recognition or support despite their achievements on the international stage.
Minimal Government Support for European Players
Blohberger didn’t shy away from discussing the lack of support from European governments for chess players. He illustrated his point by referencing German Grandmaster Frederik Svane, who won an individual gold medal at the 2024 Olympiad but only received €3,000 for his accomplishments. This example poignantly highlights how insufficient recognition can discourage young talents from pursuing chess seriously as a career.
Why the Future of Chess Depends on Change
“Without substantial change, European professional chess will suffer greatly,” Blohberger stated. He stressed the importance of addressing these financial disparities and called for action to support chess players properly. Further, he mentioned that rising interest in faster chess formats, such as blitz and rapid games, might provide a potential lifeline for competitive chess, helping to draw in more audiences and, with them, more sponsorship revenues.
What Can Be Done?
Those passionate about chess can play a role in changing the narrative by supporting local chess clubs and organizations or participating in awareness campaigns. Increased interest and attendance at local tournaments can also help draw attention to the needs of players at all levels. As the chess community rallies together, it could lead to positive developments that ensure the game’s health and provide a sustainable future for players everywhere.
Conclusion: The Importance of Collective Action
The discussion around the financial challenges faced by chess players globally is not just about numbers; it’s about keeping a beloved game alive. As experts like Blohberger bring these issues to light, it encourages conversations about how the community can come together to make a difference. Chess is not only a game but a world of strategy, skill, and hard work, and its players deserve every opportunity to thrive.